Awangsa Bina Sdn Bhd V Mayland Avenue Sdn Bhd
![Http Arbitrationblog Kluwerarbitration Com 2020 05 24 Arbitration Clauses Insolvency Proceedings And A Lack Of Consistency Across The Common Law Doing Wp Cron 1590303719 5212740898132324218750 Print Pdf](https://cdn.vdokumen.net/img/1200x630/reader015/image/20170729/5571fb214979599169940636.png?t=1599360349)
The company s line of business includes the construction of nonresidential buildings.
Awangsa bina sdn bhd v mayland avenue sdn bhd. 283857 t petitioner and mayland avenue sdn bhd company no. Site designed by tommy ng. Awangsa bina sdn bhd was founded in 1993. Awangsa bina sdn bhd v mayland avenue sdn bhd wa 28ncc 1146 12 20018 6 14 jinpeng group ltd v peak hotels and resorts ltd bvihcmap2014 0025 and bvihcmap2015 15 the city hotel londonderry.
5th floor prima 8 prima avenue block 3508. In the matter of mayland avenue sdn bhd company no. Jalan teknokrat 6 63000 cyberjaya selangor d e. Wong chee lin j grounds of judgment why is the case important.
Awangsa bina sdn bhd v mayland avenue sdn bhd 1 lns 590 hc judge. 603 8320 3399 f. These issues were considered in the recent malaysian high court case of awangsa bina sdn bhd v mayland avenue sdn bhd. The recent high court decision in awangsa bina sdn bhd v mayland avenue sdn bhd grounds of judgment dated 2 may 2019 decided that it would not stay the winding up proceedings under the aa 2005.
Awangsa bina sdn bhd. Awangsa bina sdn bhd incorporated in the year 1993 started from humble beginnings of small to medium sized construction trade works. 796032 u respondent grounds of judgment 1. Over the years we continually enhance our quality of work through hard work and experience.
The petitioner has filed a winding up petition against the. 796032 u between awangsa bina sdn bhd company no. The case held that a stay of court proceedings under section 10 of the aa 2005 cannot apply to staying a winding up petition.